Joe BoxerYes, men and women are represented with equal authority.
No, this ad does not reflect that both men and woman are decision makers when buying these products.
The man is in his boxers, so a person can take it as the man is exploited in this ad or not.
There is sexual exploitation. It is irrelevant associations because the man is used so that people will buy the product. In this case it is advertising Joe Boxer.
One person is not exerting domination or violence over another.
A change that I would suggest that the advertiser should make to this ad is to put a warning up for this ad that it might be disturbing towards some viewers.
I think that this ad got its point across that Joe Boxer products are comfortable and fashionable. I did not find this ad offensive. I found this ad effective because they are trying to get people to believe them that their products are comfortable by saying "With underwear like this, who needs pants."
Wrigley Big RedI do not think that women and men are represented with equal authority because of the fact that there is a guy laying on a couch and a girl in a half kneeling, half standing position.
I do not think that this ad reflects the idea that both men and women are decision makers when buying products.
I would agree that the women is sexually exploited in this ad because her body is on display for the public in a provocative manner.
The type of sexual exploitation is objectification because this ad is using men and women to sell there products.
One person is not exerting domination or violence over another.
Some changes that I would suggest that the advertiser should make to this ad is that they should make this ad less provocative.
I thought that this ad was a little offensive because of the fact that it is showing a women in a sexual manner. I found this ad appealing more then anything because it is not effective in my opinion because of the way that the ad is advertising their product.
Lee JeansI do not think that men and women are represented with equal authority because there is a woman lying in a sexual related manner with hardly no clothes on : short, shorts and a shirt that is showing way more then actually needed.
This ad does not reflect the idea that men and women are both decision makers when buying this product because not very rarely do you see men traveling around with short, short shorts on.
There is a woman being sexually exploited in this ad because her body is on display in a "sexy" matter for the public.
The type of sexual exploitation us irrelevant because the woman's body is being used to advertise Lee Jeans.
No, one person is not exerting domination or violence over another.
Some changes that I would suggest the advertiser should make to this ad is that the woman in this ad should be not shown in such a "sexy" and provocative manner.
I thought that this ad was a little offensive because of the way that it protrayed women. I found this ad appealing more then effective because of the fact the way the woman is in this ad.